Farm machinery can expose operators to several hazards. Whole-body vibration (WBV) is known to be associated with back and hip disorders, but can also contribute to the risk of falls and collisions (‘accidents’). The years 1990 - 2008 averaged 104 Canadian farm fatalities/year and over 70% were related to agricultural machinery; during that period there were 38 fatalities specifically due to falls from agricultural machines. Driving itself also presents a health and safety risk. Between 2003 and 2007, 19.5% of all road fatalities were a result of heavy vehicle collisions/loss-of-control events, and a vast majority of crashes were attributed to driver error. Both fall risk and collision risk may be negatively affected by vibration exposure. The short-term effects of WBV include cognitive impairment, stress, loss of balance, reduced proprioception, and decrements in sensory and motor response. These effects can increase the risk of either a fall (due to disturbance of balance and proprioception), and increase the risk of a collision (due to impaired cognition, perturbed position sense, or errors of judgment). WBV is a thus contributing factor to fatal and non-fatal occupational injury resulting from accidents and errors, including equipment and machine-related injuries, falls, and vehicle crashes.
While engineering solutions such as vibration-dampening seating and engine isolation can reduce the whole body vibration levels associated with back pain, they do not mitigate the effects of extended static sitting. It is also not clear whether the frequencies of vibration reduced by specialized seating is the same ranges of the vibration spectrum which affect cognition, balance, and proprioception. Vibration-dampening seating is also very expensive (approximately $6000 USD per seat), limiting its feasibility for many producers. Alternatively, procedural controls such as rest breaks can be applied immediately without a cash investment. Advice commonly given to workers who are seated for extended periods is to get up and move around periodically to reduce musculoskeletal effects. For example, the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety recommends standing up and moving for 5-10 minutes out of every hour. There is also evidence that specific neck, arm, and leg movements performed after vibration can reduce vibration-related decrements in balance and proprioception. It may be that an appropriately-designed ‘alternate activity break’ can reduce the combined effects of seating and vibration, thereby reducing the risk of back and hip pain, egress injuries, and operator-error-related collisions.
The objective of this project is to develop a procedural control in the form of an intervention program appropriate for delivery to farmers. This project will involve the use of efficacy trials in the CCHSA Ergonomics Lab (https://research-groups.usask.ca/ergolab/), usability trials and user focus groups with farmers, followed by field testing for effectiveness.
Aims of Project
In order to deliver a procedural control and implementation plan suitable for wide-scale use or evaluation, this project will:
- Assemble a stakeholder advisory group of producers and other knowledge-users to help direct the study.
- Conduct a series of lab-based experiments to identify rest break activities that are most effective in reducing performance decrements associated with seated whole-body vibration (such as that found in tractor operation).
- Assemble the most effective activities into a single rest break protocol and test using farm-realistic exposure durations.
For further information about this project, please contact Program Manager Nadia Smith at 306-966-1648 or by email at firstname.lastname@example.org
CAIR, Agricultural fatalities in Canada, 1990-2008, in Canadian Agricultural Injury Reporting. 2011: Edmonton, Alberta. p. 74.
CCOHS. Stretching - At the Workstation. OSH Answers Fact Sheets 2014 [cited 2017 May 17]; Available from: https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/ergonomics/office/stretching.html.
Essien, S.K., et al., Association Between Farm Machinery Operation and Low Back Disorder in Farmers: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2016. 58(6): p. e212-e217.
Lamond, N., D. Dawson, and G.D. Roach, Fatigue assessment in the field: validation of a hand-held electronic psychomotor vigilance task. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 2005. 76(5): p. 486-489.
Ljungberg, J., G. Neely, and R. Lundström, Cognitive performance and subjective experience during combined exposures to whole-body vibration and noise. International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2004. 77(3): p. 217-221.
Ljungberg, J.K. and G. Neely, Stress, subjective experience and cognitive performance during exposure to noise and vibration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2007. 27(1): p. 44-54.
Mani, R., et al., Effects of agricultural quad bike driving on postural control during static, dynamic and functional tasks–A field study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2015. 50: p. 158-169.
Milosavljevic, S., et al., Factors associated with quad bike loss of control events in agriculture. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2011. 41(3): p. 317-321.
Oullier, O., et al., Countering postural posteffects following prolonged exposure to whole-body vibration: a sensorimotor treatment. European journal of applied physiology, 2009. 105(2): p. 235-245.
Pollock, R.D., et al., The effects of whole body vibration on balance, joint position sense and cutaneous sensation. European journal of applied physiology, 2011. 111(12): p. 3069-3077.
Taylor, W.C., et al., The Booster Break program: description and feasibility test of a worksite physical activity daily practice. Work, 2010. 37(4): p. 433-443.
Thiffault, P., Addressing human factors in the motor carrier industry in Canada. 2011: Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators (CCMTA).
Tombaugh, T.N., Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2004. 19(2): p. 203-214.